On April 5th, the House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary held a hearing entitled “Enhancing the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938.” The Foreign Agents Registration Act (“FARA”). The hearing—the first dedicated to FARA in 30 years—focused on potential changes to the law as well as its current limitations.
The hearing included the following witnesses:
- Dylan Hedtler-Gaudette, Government Affairs Manager, Project On Government Oversight
- Dr. Jacob Strauss, Specialist on the Congress, Congressional Research Service
- Nick Robinson, Senior Legal Advisor, U.S. Program, International Center for Not-For-Profit Law
- Jonathan Turley, J.B. and Maurice C. Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law; Director, Environmental Law Advocacy Center, The George Washington University Law School
Committee members and witnesses discussed how to balance the transparency purposes of FARA without infringing upon the First Amendment-protected activities regulated by the statute – a tension Congressional Research Service historian Dr. Jacob Strauss told the committee existed even at the time of the law’s passing.
Mr. Robinson pointed out that the Department of Justice has issued over 50 advisory opinions on FARA’s definition of “agency,” noting that its requirement that the agent act at the “request” of the foreign principal is broader than more commonly used definitions of “agency,” which requires acting at the direction or control of another with the consent of both parties. Mr. Robinson contended that more precise definitions of key terms was required to better tailor the law to its purpose.
Mr. Hedtler-Gaudette argued for eliminating the Lobbying Disclosure Act (“LDA”) registration exemption, saying it is insufficient for FARA’s transparency goals. He also urged Congress to act on standardizing and modernizing FARA filings, noting that some may be inaccessible to people with disabilities.
Other witnesses pointed out First Amendment concerns with the statute, arguing that it is a largely ambiguous statute that is inconsistently applied. The law’s civil injunctive remedy and its criminal penalties also concerned some lawmakers, who raised the possibility of the law’s being weaponized against political opponents.
Ultimately, the hearing was reflective of the increased interest in FARA by lawmakers and the public alike. With the Department of Justice’s anticipated Notice of Proposed Rulemaking set to make modernizing changes to the law, it is likely that many of the concerns raised in the hearing will be addressed.
For more information regarding FARA, please contact us using our online form.
An Informational Resource in a New Era of Foreign Agents Registration Act Enforcement.
Recent Blog Posts
- Trump Ally Acquitted of Violating FARA
- Federal Court Grants Casino Mogul Steve Wynn Dismissal of DOJ FARA Suit
- DOJ Sues Casino Mogul Steve Wynn to Compel FARA Registration
- Former US Ambassador to Plead Guilty to Violating Post-Employment Ethics Law in Qatar Representation
- Chinese National Charged with Acting as an Illegal Agent of the Chinese Government in the United States
- House Judiciary Committee Holds First FARA Hearing In 30 Years
- Dual Russia-U.S. Citizen Charged With FARA Violations, Remains At-Large
- DOJ Unseals Indictment Charging U.S. Resident With Acting As An Agent Of Egypt Government
- DOJ Solicits Public Input on Potential Changes to FARA
- Task Force on FARA Releases Report
- November 2022
- October 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- July 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- September 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- February 2020
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019