Just two weeks before jury selection was scheduled to begin, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York filed a Deferred Prosecution Agreement with Sue Mi Terry, a former CIA analyst and National Security Council official the Department of Justice had charged in July 2024 with acting as an unregistered agent of the South Korean government. The agreement puts the prosecution on hold for 12 months and, if Terry complies with its terms, ends it entirely. The resolution closes a closely watched FARA prosecution, and results in part from a robust and able effort by Terry’s legal defense team.
Terry served in the U.S. government as a CIA analyst on East Asian issues, as Director for Korea, Japan, and Oceanic Affairs at the National Security Council, and as Deputy National Intelligence Officer for East Asia at the National Intelligence Council. After leaving government, she became a prominent voice on Korea policy in Washington, holding posts at a series of think tanks, publishing widely, and testifying before Congress.
The 2024 indictment alleged that after her government service, Terry acted at the direction of officers of South Korea’s National Intelligence Service (“NIS”), advocating South Korean policy positions, disclosing nonpublic U.S. government information, and providing South Korean officials access to U.S. officials. The centerpiece allegation was that in June 2022, immediately after an off-the-record meeting between Korea policy experts and Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Terry’s alleged NIS “handler” picked her up in a car bearing South Korean Embassy diplomatic plates, where she handed over detailed handwritten notes of the meeting that the handler photographed. In return, the indictment alleged, NIS officers bought her luxury goods (a Bottega Veneta handbag, a Louis Vuitton handbag, and a Dolce & Gabbana coat), treated her to meals at Michelin-starred restaurants, and deposited approximately $37,000 into an account at her think-tank employer. She was charged with one count of conspiracy to violate FARA and one count of failing to register under FARA, each carrying a maximum of five years in prison.
The case was set for trial before Judge Lorna G. Schofield when the parties filed the four-page agreement.
The agreement itself is relatively sparse. Prosecutors offered no explanation beyond the standard recital that deferral best serves the interests of the United States and the defendant. The agreement’s conditions require Terry to remain in the continental United States, avoid knowingly communicating with any NIS officer or employee, refuse any gift worth more than $100 from a foreign government, and file a FARA registration to the extent she engages in FARA-registrable activity. If Terry fully complies with the agreement, no further prosecution will be brought for these offenses.
Although the agreement does not require Terry to admit guilt, it attaches an Agreed Statement of Facts that tracks many of the indictment’s factual allegations in more muted and neutral terms.
The Terry resolution is the second high-profile FARA matter in recent years to end in a deferred prosecution agreement rather than a plea or verdict, following the January 2024 deferred prosecution agreements with Barry Bennett and Douglas Watts. The Bennett and Watts agreements were far less favorable than the Terry agreement, though. Bennett consented to a two-count information charging a scheme to falsify, conceal, and cover up material facts from the Department and the making of false statements and material omissions in FARA filings. He also agreed to pay $100,000, correct submitted FARA filings, and refrain from FARA-registrable conduct for 18 months. Watts consented to a three-count information charging willful failure to register and making false statements. He also agreed to pay $25,000, file an accurate and complete registration, and refrain from FARA-registrable conduct for 12 months.
For more information regarding FARA, please contact us using our online form.
An Informational Resource in a New Era of Foreign Agents Registration Act Enforcement.
Search
Recent Blog Posts
- DOJ Defers Prosecution in Sue Mi Terry Case
- A Look Back: The German-American Vocational League Case
- The FARA Conference Draws a Full House in Washington
- A Look Back: The Kaveh Afrasiabi Case
- Final Rules (Finally)?
- A Look Back: The Billy Carter Affair
- A Look Back: The Tongsun Park Case
- A History of FARA Registration
- A Look Back: The 1941 Prosecution of Aviator Laura Ingalls
- A Look Back: The 1992 Indictment of Sam Zakhem, a Rare FARA Case in the 1990s
Bios
Archives
- October 2026
- September 2026
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- March 2026
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- December 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- January 2024
- July 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- July 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- September 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- February 2020
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
